Swanson v. Flores
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion
1 esl ee slain 2 FILED. 4 GLERK, U6. DISTRICT COURT 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 || JAMIE SWANSON, Case No.: 3:23-cv-02021-BEN-DEB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 || 12 || DIONISIO FLORES, [ECF No. 15} 13 Defendant. 14 15 || ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 16 17 Plaintiff, Jamie Swanson, initiates this action against Defendant Dionisio Flores, 18 || asserting a single claim under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act,
42 U.S.C. § 19
||2000bb, et seg. (“RFRA”). Defendant moves to dismiss the claim pursuant to Fed. R. 90 || Civ. Proc. 12(b)(6) asserting…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.