Legal Opinion

Vance v. Hammer

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1970No. 9670PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOCKWOOD, Chief Justice:

Appellant, Virgil Vance; dba Virgil Vance Farms, defendant below, appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff. The appellant is the owner of farming and ranching concerns near Queen Creek, Arizona. The appellee, R. Hammer, dba Hammer Well Drilling Co., plaintiff below, is a well driller. The facts are as follows:

Beginning in the spring of 1964, appellant employed appellee to dig and repair three wells on farms or ranches owned by appellant. Work on the first well, a ten-inch well, was completed satisfactorily and paid for in full. On about June 20, 1964, the parties…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lenchitsky v. H. J. Sandberg Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Tucson Utility Supplies, Inc. v. GallagherArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Johnston v. BurnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. Green v. HuberArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Hutchinson v. Culbertson Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Best Choice Fund, LLC v. Low & Childers, P.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  2. Jackie Abbott v. Banner Health NetworkArizona Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Baker v. EmmersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  4. Frank Culver Electric, Inc. v. JorgensonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. Flagel v. Southwest Clinical Physiatrists, P.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API