Hutchinson v. Culbertson Et Ux.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Reno, J.,
In this assumpsit action to recover for work performed, the trial judge directed a verdict for $75.06 for plaintiff; but upon defendants’ motion for judgment n. o. v. the court en banc entered judgment for them. Plaintiff appealed.
There is no serious dispute as to the facts. Defendants engaged appellant to do plumbing work for them. No agreement was entered into as to the price or amount to be charged for the work. Upon completion of the work, appellant rendered a bill for $163.00, to which defendants objected as being too high for the work performed. Defendants requested…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Washington N. Gas Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Barron Co. v. Fox & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
3Cited by8 opinions
- Melnick v. National Air LinesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Hayden v. CoddingtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Vance v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Occidental Chemical Corp. v. Environmental Liners, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Nordling v. WHELCHEL MINES COMPANYIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.