Legal Opinion
United States v. Titus
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 24, 1946No. 3199PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORMAN, District Judge.
Harry Mace Titus, Sr., the defendant, was charged with embezzlement of certain personal property of the government at Post Exchange No. 10., Port Dix, New Jersey, a government reservation; in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 468 and R.S. 2:124-11 of New Jersey, N.J.S.A. The federal statute provides for the application of state penal statutes to actions committed on government reservations within the territorial limits of the state where they are not made penal by any laws of Congress. The latter statute of New Jersey defines the following offense:
“Any consignee, factor,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hancey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Commonwealth v. TuckermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1857
- State v. WoodwardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
- Corbin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
- State v. RedstrakeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1877
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- George E. Shibley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- United States v. KrawczykUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- State v. GreathouseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. GreathouseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002