Legal Opinion

People v. Nix

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1996No. 103072, Calendar No. 1PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, J.

This case presents us with the question whether defendant’s rights under the Double Jeopardy Clause were violated. The Court of Appeals concluded that such a violation had occurred, and reversed defendant’s conviction. We now affirm.

i

Defendant was charged with one count of first-degree premeditated murder and one count of felony murder.1 The victim was kidnapped by defendant’s *622boyfriend, Robert Hogans,2 who locked the victim in the trunk of her own car while he, often accompanied by defendant, used the car for six days. The victim ultimately died from a combination of dehydration and methanol…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. SzalmaMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. VincentMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. EvansMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. EvansMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. People v. LimmerMichigan Supreme Court · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API