Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Hennen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 25, 1963No. 38,685, 38,686PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

After verdicts for plaintiffs in actions consolidated for trial, defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdicts or for a new trial.

Plaintiffs sued to recover under the Civil Damage Act, Minn. St. 340.95.

The essential issues for review are: Whether the evidence sustains the verdicts; whether the sale of an intoxicant to a minor can constitute a proximate cause under § 340.95 where said intoxicant is later consumed by an adult legally entitled to be served the intoxicant; and whether the opinion of a police officer as to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Beck v. GroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Hahn v. City of OrtonvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Strand v. Village of WatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Beckman v. SchroederSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Carmody v. AhoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Kvanli v. Village of WatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  3. Gabus v. HarveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  4. Pose v. ROOSEVELT HOTEL COMAPNYSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  5. Skaja v. Andrews Hotel CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API