Osage Oil & Refining Co. v. Mulber Oil Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.
The appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that Felix Quinlan, E. A. Babcock and the Gypsy Oil Company, are necessary parties to this appeal ; that they have not been joined as appellees, and that the time has now expired within which an appeal can be taken as to them.
There is also a motion of appellants, filed after the expiration of the statutory time in which to appeal, to make the same parties appellees. The motions were submitted on briefs.
There were numerous defendants named in the amended bill of complaint, hut the only defendants…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Forgay v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Masterson v. HerndonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Hardee v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Brewster v. WakefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mitchell v. LayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
- Martin v. National Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- City of Shidler v. H. C. Speer & Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Barringer v. LilleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Edwards v. Holland Banking Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.