Legal Opinion
Ottenritter v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 6, 1989No. Civ. A. HAR 89-1309PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HARGROVE, District Judge.
Currently pending before this Court is defendant Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.’s (“Shearson”) Motion to Stay Judicial Proceedings and Compel Arbitration. The issues have been fully briefed. A hearing on the issues was held on September 26, 1989.
FACTS
Plaintiff Edith H. Ottenritter (“Ottenritter”) opened a nondiscriminatory individual brokerage account with Shearson on October 30, 1984. On November 7, 1984, Ottenritter and her husband opened a joint brokerage account with Shearson. Plaintiff claims that at all times pertinent to her complaint she was an…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Leonard v. Stuart-James Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1990
- Storey v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Clark v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,706 Catholic Diocese of Brownsville, Texas v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Storey v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.