Cruz v. Sun World International, LLC
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HILL, P. J.
— -Plaintiffs appeal from.the denial of their motion for class certification. They contend the trial court’s ruling abused its discretion because it rested on improper criteria or erroneous legal assumptions. We find no such error has been demonstrated and affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs filed this action on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated. They alleged defendant owned, controlled, or operated agricultural operations in California. The original complaint was alleged on behalf of the named plaintiffs and “all other persons employed by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Dailey v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Aguiar v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Faulkinbury v. Boyd & Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Sanchez v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Noel v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2019
- Payton v. CSI Elec. Contractors, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Barriga v. 99 Cents Only Stores LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Barriga v. 99 Cents Only Stores LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Cacho v. Eurostar, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.