Aguiar v. Cintas Corp. No. 2
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERLUSS, P. J.
Hermelinda Aguiar, Alicia Maria Aldrete, Aurora Banuelos and Maria Alicia Gonzalez (collectively plaintiffs) filed this lawsuit as a putative class action against their employer, Cintas Corporation No. 2 and Cintas Corporation No. 3 (Cintas), for violation of the Los Angeles Living Wage Ordinance (TWO) (L.A. Admin. Code, § 10.37 et seq.) and related claims. The trial court denied their motion for class certification, finding the proposed class was not ascertainable and lacked a well-defined community of interest and class treatment was not the superior means to resolve…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Richmond v. Dart Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Bufil v. Dollar Financial Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Ghazaryan v. Diva Limousine, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- SEVIDAL v. Target Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Sotelo v. Medianews Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.