Legal Opinion

Faulkinbury v. Boyd & Associates, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 10, 2013No. G041702PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FYBEL, J.—

Introduction

Plaintiffs Josie Faulkinbury and William Levene (together, Plaintiffs), on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, appealed from the order denying their motion for class certification. They sought to represent and certify a class of about 4,000 current and former employees of defendant Boyd & Associates, Inc. (Boyd), which provides security guard services throughout Southern California. Plaintiffs and the putative class members work or worked for Boyd as security guards. They asserted Boyd denied off-duty meal breaks and off-duty rest breaks, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Jaimez v. Daiohs USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Bufil v. Dollar Financial Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Muhammed Abdullah v. U.S. Security Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Augustus v. ABM Security ServicesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Benton v. Telecom Network Specialists, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Robles v. Agreserves, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2016
  5. Noel v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2019

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API