Legal Opinion

Metropolitan State Bank v. Wright

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 2, 1922No. 10,141PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

delivered the opinion of the court., The complaint states that to the defendant in error, Wright, on June 7,1920, John A. Henry executed his promissory note in the sum of $1500, payable four months after date, and to secure its payment gave a chattel mortgage to Wright upon certain personal property which he then owned. A payment of $400 was endorsed on the note. On. October 7, 1920, when it is alleged the note became due, and all thereof not having been paid, the defendant in .error made demand upon Henry for delivery to him of the mortgaged property to be sold and the proceeds applied upon…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lyon v. BallentineMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Cassell v. DeisherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  3. Bearss v. PrestonMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Eaton v. TruesdailMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Foster v. CramerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Radetsky v. Gramm-Bernstein Motor Truck Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  2. Whittier v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  3. Broadhead v. Farmers State Bank of SedgwickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  4. Wolf v. Larimer County Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  5. Amberson Investment Corp. v. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API