Bearss v. Preston
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to superior court of Detroit. (Chipman, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. Tbe facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The plaintiff brought suit in the superior court for the city of Detroit against the defendant, declaring in trespass on the case in four counts.
The plaintiff’s claim in substance is that he was engaged in the lumber business in the city of Detroit, renting and occupying an office and lumber yard on Fort street west. The defendant was his banker, and had made advances to him, and held a large amount of his paper, and the paper of his customers indorsed by plaintiff.
October 16, 1884, the plaintiff, to secure defendant, gave *13him a chattel mortgage on his stock of lumber in his yard, payable…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Eaton v. TruesdailMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by8 opinions
- Watkins v. LaytonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- Whiteacre v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
- Johnston & Son v. RobuckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Moore v. AndrewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Metropolitan State Bank v. WrightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.