Legal Opinion

Schrob v. Catterson

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 29, 1992No. 91-5669PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

This matter is before the court on an appeal by three federal officers from an order denying a motion to substitute the United States as a defendant with respect to certain claims in the complaint in this action. Although the case was previously before us in Schrob v. Catterson, 948 F.2d 1402, 1405-06 (3d Cir.1991) {Schrob I), for an understanding of the issues now presented it is necessary that we set forth the factual and procedural background at some length.

A. Factual Background

The case arises from the seizure by…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Aversa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. Locurto v. SafirCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  3. Acierno v. CloutierCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. James J. Giuffre v. Nicholas Bissell Richard Thornburg Robert Smith Russ Leffert Sam Debella Richard Meyers County of SomersetCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. Connie JAMISON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry WILEY, Defendant-Appellant, United States of America, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API