Legal Opinion

Neo-Ray Products, Inc. v. Boro Electric Installation, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 2, 1978PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered October 6, 1977, which denied plaintiffs motion and defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of granting defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and otherwise affirmed, with $75 costs and disbursements of this appeal to the defendants. Boro Electric Installation, Inc. (Boro), an electrical contractor, entered into an agreement with the City of New York to perform electrical work in the construction of a police station house and firehouse. Boro, as principal,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. A & J Buyers, Inc. v. Johnson, Drake & Piper, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Dorn v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis Wallbridge, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Neo-Ray Products, Inc. v. Boro Electric Installation, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Gernatt Asphalt Products, Inc. v. Bensal Construction, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Commercial Union Insurance v. Eastern Refractories Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Gernatt Asphalt Products, Inc. v. Bensal Construction, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API