Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gernatt Asphalt Products, Inc. v. Bensal Construction, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 9, 1982Published

1Dissent

Doerr and Denman, JJ. (dissenting).

We disagree with the majority insofar as they would deny plaintiffs and third-party and interpleaded defendants the right to recover under the payment bond issued to Myers by Aetna Casualty *994and Surety Company. The payment bond guarantees payment of all “lawful” claims “of the subcontractors, materialmen, laborers, persons, firms or corporations for labor performed or materials, provisions * * * used or consumed in the carrying forward, performing or completing of said [c]ontract”. We do not view this broad language as limiting protection under the payment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. v. Wells Water DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. American Surety Co. v. Wells Water DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  3. Neo-Ray Products, Inc. v. Boro Electric Installation, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. Neo-Ray Products, Inc. v. Boro Electric Installation, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. American Surety Co. v. Wells Water DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API