Legal Opinion

Gernatt Asphalt Products, Inc. v. Bensal Construction, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 9, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: We find that Bensal Construction, Inc. (Bensal) under its contract (to furnish stone and gravel for public improvement projects for the County of Erie and the Southtowns Sewage Treatment Agency) with R. P. Myers, Inc. (Myers), the general contractor, was a materialman and not a contractor or a subcontractor (see A & J Buyers v Johnson, Drake & Piper, 25 NY2d 265). Therefore, because plaintiff (which supplied stone and gravel to Bensal) and interpleaded defendants (who performed labor and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. A & J Buyers, Inc. v. Johnson, Drake & Piper, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Neo-Ray Products, Inc. v. Boro Electric Installation, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Neo-Ray Products, Inc. v. Boro Electric Installation, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davis Wallbridge, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Pennex Aluminum Co. v. International Fidelity InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Gernatt Asphalt Products, Inc. v. Bensal Construction, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API