Legal Opinion · Dissent

Oklahoma Education Ass'n, Inc. v. Nigh

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 16, 1982No. 57361Published

1DissentSimms, Justice

I must dissent. We have no facts before us in this action. A majority of the Court voted to assume jurisdiction of this matter without any factual determination having been made or any stipulation of facts agreed on, for the “sole purpose” of deciding the constitutionality of five statutes. I dissented to taking jurisdiction of this cause as it was framed, or more accurately — as it was not framed- — and I believe the problems inherent in a decision rendered in the abstract are evident from the face of the majority opinion.1

The opinion is not based on proven facts, but on assumptions of facts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Ass'n of Municipal Attorneys v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  2. Curtis v. Registered Dentists of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Miller v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. State Ex Rel. Com'rs of the Land Office v. PassmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. State ex rel. Com'rs of Land Office v. WallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API