Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Ass'n of Municipal Attorneys v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 25, 1978No. 51795PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Justice.

Pursuant to a proper request, Larry Der-ryberry, Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma (respondent) issued an opinion (Opinion No. 77-222) wherein he concluded that under our new “Open Meeting Act” (25 O.S.Supp.1977, § 301 et seq.) “a public body1 may not meet in executive session for the purpose of privately conferring with the lawyers representing the body.” The force and effect of such opinion is that a public body, coming within the purview of our Open Meeting Act, may not meet in executive session with its attorney for the purpose of privately discussing pending or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sacramento Newspaper Guild, Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Laman v. McCordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  3. Wiseman v. BorenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  4. In Re Lewis'adoptionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority v. E. A. Cowen Construction Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Draper v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Smith County Education Ass'n v. AndersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Naylor v. Petuskey Ex Rel. District Court of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. State Ex Rel. Howard v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Suffolk Construction Co. v. Division of Capital Asset ManagementMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API