Legal Opinion

People ex rel Peabody v. Baker

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1908PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Babeas corpus proceeding. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtMorschauser, J.

Bpon application duly made, a writ of habeas corpus was allowed by which Harry K. Thaw was directed to be produced in court. In the petition it is alleged that said Thaw is illegally imprisoned and restrained of his liberty by Amos T. Baker, acting superintendent of Hatteawan State Hospital, a State institution for the insane.

Thaw’s detention is attacked upon the grounds:

First. That he is now sane.

Second. That the act under the provisions of which he was committed and detained is unconstitutional and that the ' court was without jurisdiction to issue the order of commitment and such order was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. KoernerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re SlaybackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Ex Parte DagleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. In Re RemusOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Lee v. KolbDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1978
  5. People ex rel. Thaw v. LambNew York Supreme Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API