Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Dagley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 3, 1912No. 3948PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Proceeding by Azillah Amanda Dagley for a writ of habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The-petition of Elias Dagley in this case seeks to secure the discharge of his wife, Azillah Amanda Dag-ley, from the custody of Dr. D. W. Griffin, superintendent of the Oklahoma Sanitarium Company, of Norman, Okla., an institution for the confinement and protection of the insane of said state, under contract and supervision of the state. The response specifically charges full notice and opportunity to be heard, and the appearance in person of Mrs. Dagley before the insanity board. It is then charged that the husband of Mrs. Amanda Dag-ley did have notice and was present at the trial…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Nobles v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Sporza v. . German Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Underwood v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. In re FerrierIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  5. DowdellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. White v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. Mathews v. SniggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Barry v. HallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  5. Bilby v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API