Legal Opinion
Shively v. Garage Employees Local Union No. 44
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 12, 1940No. 28155PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 108 P.2d 354. This action was instituted by J.E. Shively and W.V. Frisby against Garage Employees Local Union No. 44 and Gordon Lindsay, its secretary and business agent, for the purpose of enjoining defendants from picketing plaintiffs' places of business, or using any coercive measures whatsoever, with the intent to force plaintiffs to discharge their present employees or compel them against their will to join defendant union.
The complaint alleges that plaintiffs each own and operate a retail gasoline station in the city of Seattle; that plaintiff Frisby has two employees…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Gazzam v. Building Service Employees International Union, Local 262Washington Supreme Court · 1947
- Fine Arts Guild, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Markham & Callow, Inc. v. International WoodworkersOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- O'Neil v. Building Service Employees International Union, Local No. 6Washington Supreme Court · 1941
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.