Legal Opinion

Fine Arts Guild, Inc. v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1968No. 38815PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

Ordinances Nos. 83099 and 932271 of the city of Seattle undertake, through a board of theatre supervisors, to regulate and classify motion pictures and allied forms of entertainment as to their moral content. Respondents in the present actions, consolidated for purposes of trial and appeal, challenge the constitutionality of the respective ordinances upon the grounds that they violated the first2 and fourteenth3 amendments to the United States Constitution, *505and Const, art. 1, §§ 34, 5,5 and 12.6 The trial court sustained the challenges. The city of Seattle and its coparties appeal. We affirm…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. CoeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Griffin v. EllerWashington Supreme Court · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API