Haines v. Raven Arms
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FLAHERTY, Justice.
This is an appeal by plaintiffs below from the grant of a remittitur which reduced damages for pain and suffering from $8,000,000 to $5,000,000, following a jury verdict in the former amount, in a case involving serious and permanent debilitating injuries caused by an accidental shooting 427 Pa.Super. 650, 625 A.2d 96.
The facts in the record and inferences from the facts, taken in the light most favorable to the verdict winner, may be summarized as follows. In 1981, Mrs. Brenda Teagle pur*454chased a handgun for self-protection. She bought a Raven Arms P-25…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Scaife Co. v. Rockwell-Standard Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Connolly v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Kemp v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Daley v. John Wanamaker, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Carminati v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- McManamon v. WashkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Sprague v. WalterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Gunn v. GrossmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Neal v. Bavarian Motors, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Ponzini v. PrimeCare Medical, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.