Legal Opinion

Haines v. Raven Arms

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1994No. Reargument Denied Reconsideration Granted and Record Remanded June 7, 1994PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs below from the grant of a remittitur which reduced damages for pain and suffering from $8,000,000 to $5,000,000, following a jury verdict in the former amount, in a case involving serious and permanent debilitating injuries caused by an accidental shooting 427 Pa.Super. 650, 625 A.2d 96.

The facts in the record and inferences from the facts, taken in the light most favorable to the verdict winner, may be summarized as follows. In 1981, Mrs. Brenda Teagle pur*454chased a handgun for self-protection. She bought a Raven Arms P-25…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Scaife Co. v. Rockwell-Standard Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Connolly v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Kemp v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Daley v. John Wanamaker, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Carminati v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. McManamon v. WashkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Sprague v. WalterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Gunn v. GrossmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Neal v. Bavarian Motors, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Ponzini v. PrimeCare Medical, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2017

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API