Legal Opinion

Graziadei v. DDR MacH. Co., Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided October 19, 1987No. 05-86-01218-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Justice.

John and Brenda Graziadei appeal from a take nothing judgment in favor of D.D.R. Machine Co., Inc. In two points of error, the Graziadeis contend that the trial court erred by failing to grant them a judgment non obstante veredicto because as a matter of law, D.D.R. had participated in placing a defectively designed product in the stream of commerce, or alternatively, as a matter of law, D.D.R. sold the defectively designed product. We disagree and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

The Graziadeis’ suit was for personal injuries after John Graziadei was struck by defectively…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Trenholm v. RatcliffTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. C. & R. TRANSPORT, INC. v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Rourke v. GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Collora v. NavarroTexas Supreme Court · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. Hearst Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  2. Prellwitz v. Cromwell, Truemper, Levy, Parker & Woodsmale, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  3. St. James Transportation Co. v. Porter, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  4. State ex rel. Texas Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardation v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API