Gonzales v. Hearst Corp.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOWLER, Justice.
Appellant, Ricardo Gonzales (“Gonzales”), appeals from a final judgment in favor of appellees, the Hearst Corporation and the Houston Chronicle Publishing Company (the “Chronicle”). Finding no evidence the Chronicle knowingly printed appellant’s name falsely or with reckless disregard as to its truthfulness, the trial court granted appel-lees’ motion for instructed verdict, and entered a take nothing judgment. In one point of error, appellant asserts the trial court erred in granting the appellees’ motion for instructed verdict. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Journal-Gazette Co. v. Bandido's, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Joseph v. Daily News Publishing Co.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
- Dolcefino v. Turner, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
- Bunton v. Bentley, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1999
- FOX Entertainment Group, Inc. v. Abdel-HafizCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.