Legal Opinion

Hill v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1989No. 908PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MELINSON, Judge:

The appellant, Romaine Hill, was severely injured in an accident while a passenger in an automobile driven by the appellee, Howard Ernest Reynolds. The accident occurred when Reynolds’s automobile left the roadway and struck a guardrail. Following a three-day jury trial, the jury found that Hill’s injuries were caused by the joint negligence of Hill and Reynolds. Reynolds was found to be seventy percent (70%) negligent and Hill thirty percent (30%) negligent. Damages were assessed at One Hundred Three Thousand Dollars ($103,000.00). Hill’s post-trial motions were denied, and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Kuisis v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. GriscavageSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. HarperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Karcesky v. LariaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Bohner v. Eastern Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clayton v. McCulloughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Blancha v. Raymark IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. Hannon v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. 36 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 435, prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,262 Edward T. Blancha, of the Estate of Frank D. Thomas, Deceased, and Sonya Thomas in Her Own Right v. Raymark Industries Eagle Picher Industries, Inc. Garlock, Inc. Celotex Gaf Owens Illinois Keene Corporation, Keene CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  5. City of Lancaster v. Germer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API