Legal Opinion

Blancha v. Raymark Industries

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 7, 1992No. 91-1928PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

COWEN, Circuit Judge.

This personal injury action arose out of the mesothelioma-related death of Frank Thomas. Following a jury trial, a verdict was rendered in favor of defendant Keene Corporation. The plaintiffs moved for a new trial and the district court granted the plaintiffs’ motion. The plaintiff prevailed at the second trial. Keene appeals from the order of the district court which granted the new trial. We must determine whether the reasons advanced by the district court warranted the grant of a new trial. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the order…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Willie H. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  5. Robertson v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Drysdale v. WoerthDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Suter v. General Accident Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
  3. Reinco, Inc. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  4. Whitmill v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Monsanto Co. v. Mycogen Plant Science, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API