Legal Opinion

Lydiard v. Coffee

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 28, 1926No. 25,238PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

This case was here before on an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. See 158 Minn. 520, 198 N. W. 140.

The purpose of the action is to compel the defendant trust company to deliver to the plaintiff Lydiard a deed, executed by the defendants Dr. C. C. Coffee and his wife, Alma V., and deposited in escrow, and to pay to Lydiard the proceeds of the subsequent sale of one of the lots described in the deed. Dr. and Mrs. Coffee will hereafter be referred to as defendants, and they and the plaintiff Lydiard are the real parties in interest. The principal issues of fact…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Derby v. GallupSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
  2. Horn v. HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. St. Paul & Sioux City Railroad v. GardnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
  4. Nielsen v. City of Albert LeaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  5. Nordsell v. NeilsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. MolineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Jefferson County Bank v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. Pillsbury Investment Co. v. OttoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Comstock & Davis, Inc. v. G.D.S. & AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Security State Bank of Aitkin v. MorlockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API