Legal Opinion
United States v. Adalberto Murguia-Rodriguez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 1, 2016No. 14-10400PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN.
OPINION
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
The Court Interpreters Act protects the rights of federal litigants with limited English proficiency by requiring that courts' utilize the services of certified interpreters in proceedings instituted by the United States when the failure to do so would inhibit the party’s ability to participate fully in the proceedings. The Act also provides procedural safeguards to ensure that any waiver of this right is done knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily. Prior to his trial, Defendant Adalberto…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Guillermo VallejoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Jose Luis Gonzalez-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Pablo Varela-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. PoulsenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Jong Moon Lim, Dong Joon Ahn, Chul KoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- BELCHER, JR. (NORMAN) VS. STATE (DEATH PENALTY-DIRECT)Nevada Supreme Court · 2020
- United States v. Lidia RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Austin CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Diana YatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Jason JayavarmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.