Legal Opinion

United States v. Jason Jayavarman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 26, 2017No. 16-30082PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLIFTON, Circuit Judge:

It is a crime to produce outside the United States a visual depiction of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct and to then transport that visual depiction into the United States. 18 U.S.C. § 2251(c). It is also a crime to attempt to produce and transport into the United States a visual depiction of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct. 18 U.S.C. § 2251(e).

In this case, we consider what happens when a defendant believes that the victim appearing in a depiction is a minor but the victim turns out to be an adult. That defendant cannot be convicted of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Ashcroft v. Free Speech CoalitionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Yeager v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Sarah CoxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. People of Guam v. Philips James SablanSupreme Court of Guam · 2023
  3. People of Guam v. Philips James SablanSupreme Court of Guam · 2023
  4. United States v. AnastasioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. AnastasioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API