Legal Opinion
United States v. Bradley
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided January 20, 2010No. 09-5002/NAPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge STUCKY
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The Judge Advocate General of the Navy certified two issues for review pursuant to Article 67(a)(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 867(a)(2) (2006). The certificate asks this Court to determine whether the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) erred by (1) finding that the military judge abused his discretion when he denied the defense motion to disqualify trial counsel from further participation in the case, and (2) setting aside the findings and sentence without finding that the trial counsels’…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. InabinetteCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
- United States v. Duvalier Antonio DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
- United States v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
- United States v. HardyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
- United States v. ArellanoNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
- United States v. BarkerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.