Legal Opinion
United States v. Bradley
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided February 29, 2012No. 11-0399/NAPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge STUCKY
delivered the opinion of the Court.
We granted review in this case to determine: (1) whether the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) was bound by this Court’s prior decision that Appellant’s unconditional guilty pleas were provident despite waiving a motion to disqualify trial counsel; (2) whether Appellant received ineffective assistance of counsel; and (3) whether the law of the case doctrine required the CCA to find prejudice from counsel’s deficient performance given the CCA’s prior holding that Appellant was entitled to relief. We hold that the CCA…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. BoniorUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
- United States v. BrightwellNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019
- United States v. BrooksUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
- United States v. Captain ELMO E. VANCEArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
- United States v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2020
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.