American Chemical Paint Co. v. Parker Rust Proof Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
Findings of Fact.
LEDERLE, District Judge.
1. Plaintiff filed this suit for a declaratory judgment of its rights with respect to both infringement and validity of defendant’s United States Patents Nos. 1,911,726 and 1,869,121, and for recovery of damages incident to alleged unfair trade practices of the defendant. Defendant counterclaimed for infringement under Patent 1,911,726 only.
Both patents are process patents relating to the art of coating metals for the purpose of making surfaces rust-resisting, commonly called “rust-proofing”.
2. No evidence was offered that plaintiff or its customers…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Dow Chemical Co. v. Williams Bros. Well Treating Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Parker-Rust-Proof Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1945