Richard L. Dehart and Phoebe D. Dehart, His Wife, D/B/A Dehart Oil Company v. Richfield Oil Corporation, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BYRNE, District Judge:
This appeal is one more step in a running battle between these parties. The problems are all traceable to various business arrangements apparently commenced in 1956 whereby appellee’s petroleum products were to be distributed through appellants’ filling stations. In 1960 the appellants commenced a lawsuit in the Federal Courts alleging certain antitrust violations by the appellee and others. That lawsuit was settled by the then attorney for the appellants and agreements were drawn up. The appellants, however, refused to sign the agreements on the ground that their…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Ricketts v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Beaver v. Estate of HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Combined Bronx Amusements, Inc. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Virginia Impression Products Co., Inc. v. Scm Corporation, Virginia Impression Products Co., Inc. v. Scm CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- Paula-Beth Lashley Maher, Administratrix of the Succession of Morris G. Maher v. The City of New OrleansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Shlensky v. DorseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Shlensky v. DorseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.