Legal Opinion
Combined Bronx Amusements, Inc. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 21, 1955PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYAN, District Judge.
Defendants move under Rule 56, Fed. Rules Civ.Proc., for partial summary judgment dismissing the claims of plaintiff Combined Bronx which accrued pri- or to June 16, 1949, the effective date specified in certain mutual releases made between Combined Bronx and certain of the defendants on October 6, 1949.
Execution and delivery of the releases is not in dispute. By the terms of the instruments each of the parties did “mutually discharge each other” and “the respective subsidiary, parent and affiliated companies of the Distributor:” “from any and all claims, demands,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Milks v. McIverNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Stella v. KaiserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Rector of St. James Church v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Duffy Theatres, Inc. v. Griffith Consol. Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- Efthimi Thomas v. Mutual Benefit Health and Accident AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
3Cited by26 opinions
- Corrosioneering, Inc. v. Thyssen Environmental Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Campbell v. Westmoreland Farm, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Walder v. Paramount Publix CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Dura Electric Lamp Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.