Legal Opinion

Matter of Meisnere

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 11, 1984No. M-134-82PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

We are presented with a Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility that respondent be disbarred from the practice of law. The Board found that respondent was convicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia of perjury, 18 U.S.C. § 1623, and conspiracy to defraud the United States Internal Revenue Service, 18 U.S.C. § 371. The Board further found that both of these offenses involved moral turpitude, requiring disbarment pursuant to D.C.Code § ll-2503(a) (1981).

We accept the Board’s findings of fact as being supported by…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Matter of ColsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Matter of KerrDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Matter of WillcherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Matter of PhillipsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982

4Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re McBrideDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. In Re CorizziDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. In Re KerrDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. In Re SneedDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. In Re the License of FanelliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API