Legal Opinion

Panchula, Admr. v. Kaya

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, J.

The appellant, Nick Panchula, as administrator, seeks, in an appeal on questions of law, to secure the reversal of a judgment of the Court of Com mon Pleas of Lorain county, which dismissed a proceeding in aid of execution against appellees, Andrew Kaya and Andrew Mihalsky, judgment debtors, because the debt upon which the proceeding in aid of execution was issued was discharged in bankruptcy by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.

An application of Section 17 of the Bankruptcy Act, Title 11, Section 35, U. S. Code, to the record facts, is dispositive of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Universal Concrete Pipe Co. v. BassettOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Reserve Trucking Co. v. FairchildOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Vecchio v. VecchioOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Denzer v. TerpstraOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  5. In re PhillipsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cogswell v. KellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Campbell v. NorgartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Leonard v. Collins (In Re Collins)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1979
  4. Jaco v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API