Legal Opinion

Denzer v. Terpstra

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1934No. 24666PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.

This court is of the opinion that the only assignment of error requiring extended consideration and discussion at this time is the one relating to the charge of the trial court on the subject of willful tort, inaccurately designated as “willful negligence.”

The plaintiff’s petition alleges that “the injuries he received and the expenses incurred as aforesaid were due solely and wholly to, and as a direct and proximate result of the negligent, reckless, unlawful, willful and wanton acts on the part of the defendant.” Then follow ten specifications.

Near the close of the court’s charge to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reserve Trucking Co. v. FairchildOhio Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Gladon v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Tighe v. DiamondOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Gladon v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API