Legal Opinion
Hartmann v. United States
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 14, 1985No. CV 85-2728PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEXLER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action against the United States government, the Veterans’ Administration (“V.A.”), its Administrator, and its employees and agents. The defendants will be denominated simply as the V.A. Plaintiffs Hartmann, Bernagozzi, and Naples are Viet Nam veterans who earlier filed malpractice suits against the V.A. under the Federal Tort Claims Act alleging failure to diagnose and treat them for filariasis. 1 Plaintiffs Agnostakios and Arnao do not appear to have filed malpractice claims and no particular factual allegations are made with respect to their…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Johnson v. RobisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wayne State University v. Max ClelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Ryan v. ClelandDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1982
- Falter v. Veterans' AdministrationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1980
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation. Philip J. Aguiar, Each of Said Individually and as Representative of All Those Similarly Situated v. United States of America, and Other Departments and Agencies of the United States Government, as Their Several Interests May Appear, and Successors to the Above Officials, as Necessary, Dan Ford, and His Wife, Christina Ford Individually, and as Members and Representative of a Class v. United States of America, Daniel C. Batts v. United States of America, Loughery v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Larrabee v. DerwinskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Larrabee ex rel. Jones v. DerwinskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Eastern Paralyzed Veterans Ass'n v. Veterans' AdministrationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Aguiar v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.