Legal Opinion
Rowe v. Godou
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 3, 1987No. 5710PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBieluch, J.
The plaintiff brought this action seeking to recover for property damage to his vehicle allegedly caused by the negligent operation by the named defendant, Raymond Godou, of a fire truck owned by the defendant city of Bridgeport. The defendants moved to strike the complaint on the ground that it was “barred by statute,” but they failed to cite statutory authority.1 In support of their motion, the defend*540ants filed a memorandum of law which referred to General Statutes § 7-308.2 The trial court granted the defendants’ motion to strike on the grounds that the notice requirements of General…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Morris v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Alarm Applications Co. v. Simsbury Volunteer Fire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters of America v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Winslow v. Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- King v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Rowe v. GodouSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Heyman Associates No. 1 v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- DeVita v. EspositoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Burton v. Planning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. OwenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.