Legal Opinion

Yudashkin v. Holden

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 2001No. Docket 220510PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkey, J.

Defendants Craig Holden and Master Home Inspector, Inc. (mhi), appeal by leave granted the trial court’s orders denying their motions for summary disposition and for reconsideration, which primarily asserted that an amended complaint filed against them was untimely. We affirm.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Defendant MHI is a Michigan corporation in the business of conducting residential home inspections. Defendant Holden is both the president of mhi and an mhi home inspector. On February 5, 1997, Holden inspected a house for plaintiff Robert Yudashkin. This lawsuit arises from plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Hoste v. Shanty Creek Management, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Heinz v. Chicago Road Investment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Lane v. Kindercare Learning Centers, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Colista v. ThomasMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Jawad a Shah Md Pc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Cuddington v. United Health Services, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Richards v. TibaldiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Marshall Lasser, PC v. GeorgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. White v. Taylor Distributing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2007

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API