Legal Opinion

Ream v. Fitzen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1978No. 15220PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice:

Defendant David L. Fitzen (hereinafter “Fitzen”) appeals from the district court’s refusal to accept his version of an accounting pertaining to the affairs of a joint venture and from the dismissal of his action to void a lien encumbrance on certain of the property of the venture.

Plaintiff Daniel P. Ream (hereinafter “Ream”) entered into a joint venture agree ment in question with Fitzen. The venture was known as the Fitzen-Ream Equipment Company and its major activity was the leasing of a truck and tractor, principally to Fitzen who was a licensed demolition contractor.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dunn v. BaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Jacobson v. JacobsonUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Del Porto v. NicoloUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  4. First Equity Corp. of Florida v. Utah State UniversityUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Dale v. DaleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Angelos v. First Interstate Bank of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Hunter v. HunterUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Nupetco Associates v. JenkinsUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Jackson v. JacksonUtah Supreme Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API