Legal Opinion
Powers v. Farricelli
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 29, 1996No. 14834PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The plaintiff Richard Powers1 appeals from the judgment rendered for the defendants after a jury *476trial. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) instructed the jury and (2) decided his motion to set aside the verdict before a motion for additur could be presented to the court.2 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury could reasonably have found the following facts. The defendants, Rudolph Farricelli and Nora Far-ricelli, owned a house at 105 Tyler Street in West Haven, which needed shingles on its roof replaced. They asked the plaintiff, a friend, to assist in this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Krattenstein v. G. Fox & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Black v. Goodwin, Loomis & Britton, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Knock v. KnockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Tessmann v. Tiger Lee Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Jeffries v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. VelezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Tomick v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Macy v. LucasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Greci v. ParksConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Cavaliere v. OlmstedConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.