Legal Opinion
Kaye v. Newhall
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 26, 1969PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpiegel, J.
The declaration in this action of tort contained three counts, one for loss of consortium and another for criminal conversation. The third count was waived at the trial. The jury returned verdicts for the plaintiff on each of the remaining counts in the amount of $45,000. The case is here on the defendant’s bill of exceptions.
We summarize the material evidence. The plaintiff was the husband of one Lynn Kaye (Mrs. Kaye). Despite differing social interests, their marriage was “on the whole ... a happy one.” Mrs. Kaye had, however, “DQor a number of years . . . without the plaintiff’s knowledge,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wellesley College v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Guinan v. Famous Players-Lasky Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Phillips v. ChaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- International Fidelity Insurance v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Diaz v. Eli Lilly & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Kowalski v. GagneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Labor Relations Commission v. Fall River Educators Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Bishop v. KLEIN FULLERMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.