Frazier v. Tulare County Board of Retirement
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRANSON, J.
This case involves a dispute between a surviving spouse, respondent Mary Weyand, and a designated beneficiary, appellant Dorothy Frazier, as to who is entitled to the death benefits payable under the Tulare County Employees’ Retirement System as a result of the death of Deputy Sheriff Clarence Weyand.
In 1930, Clarence married Mary; thereafter, they separated. In 1948, Clarence began living with Dorothy. In 1950, Clarence was employed as a deputy sheriff of Tulare County and became a member of the County Employees’ Retirement System. He designated Dorothy as the beneficiary…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- In Re Marriage of FithianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Allen v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Benson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- PUBLIC EMP. RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. PorterMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
- Dillon v. BealMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Kerlin v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Public Employees' Retirement System v. Lola PorterMississippi Supreme Court · 1999