Legal Opinion

Frazier v. Tulare County Board of Retirement

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 8, 1974No. Civ. 1908PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRANSON, J.

This case involves a dispute between a surviving spouse, respondent Mary Weyand, and a designated beneficiary, appellant Dorothy Frazier, as to who is entitled to the death benefits payable under the Tulare County Employees’ Retirement System as a result of the death of Deputy Sheriff Clarence Weyand.

In 1930, Clarence married Mary; thereafter, they separated. In 1948, Clarence began living with Dorothy. In 1950, Clarence was employed as a deputy sheriff of Tulare County and became a member of the County Employees’ Retirement System. He designated Dorothy as the beneficiary…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. In Re Marriage of FithianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Allen v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Benson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. PUBLIC EMP. RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. PorterMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Dillon v. BealMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Kerlin v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Public Employees' Retirement System v. Lola PorterMississippi Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API