Legal Opinion

Kerlin v. Board of Administration

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1979No. Civ. 15837PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REYNOSO, J.

By an action for declaratory relief plaintiff Kathie (Bonnet) Kerlin seeks a declaration that Government Code section 21205 is unconstitutional. She thereby seeks to collect death benefits from the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) as the named beneficiaiy of her former husband, Charles K. Bonnet.

Plaintiff challenges a substantive and a procedural ruling of the trial court. In its substantive ruling the trial court held that the provisions of Government Code section 21205, dealing with beneficiaries of a deceased state employee, are constitutional. Thus, plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ruster v. RusterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Frazier v. Tulare County Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coughlin v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API