Legal Opinion

The Carbone v. F. Nat. Bank, Jersey City

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided August 1, 1941No. Docket 139/213PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant, on July 22d 1941, served formal notice on the complainant that it would apply to the court on July 28th, 1941, to strike the bill of complaint upon the following grounds: (1) That it failed to set forth an equitable cause of action; (2) that complainant has a complete and adequate remedy at law. Subsequently, on July 24th, 1941, complainant's solicitors gave the solicitor of the defendant written notice that on July 28th, 1941, they would apply to the court for leave to voluntarily dismiss the bill of complaint without prejudice.

The facts as asserted in the bill and affidavits…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Norman v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Perry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. New Amsterdam v. National NewarkNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  4. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. National Newark & Essex Banking Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  5. Davis v. HeadleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1871

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commercial Trust Co. v. KohlNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  2. Hartmann v. Federal Reserve Bank of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API