Legal Opinion

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. National Newark & Essex Banking Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 31, 1936PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

We are in full accord with the reasoning and conclusions of the opinion filed by Vice-Chancellor Backes in the court of chancery; and the decree is therefore affirmed.

We do not find it necessary, in reaching this conclusion, to consider the soundness of the view stated by the author of Perry on Trusts (7th ed.) 177, and incorporated in the opinion, that, although the depositor’s conduct or course of dealing “may bring to the notice of the bank circumstances which would enable it to know that he is violating his trust, such circumstances do not impose upon the bank the duty or give it the…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Leeds v. Chase Manhattan BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  2. Caullett v. Stanley Stilwell & Sons, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. Lustrelon, Inc. v. PrutscherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  4. New Jersey Title Insurance v. CaputoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  5. Goldstein v. Commonwealth Trust Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API