Legal Opinion

State v. Culp

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 23, 1971No. 1304PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this appeal the dissenting opinion, first written, ably sets forth the disposition of all of the errors assigned by the appellant. Under these circumstances it would be a useless and absurd task for us to rewrite in this majority opinion either a statement of facts or the disposition of the first, third and fourth assignments of error, with which disposition we concur. We, therefore, set forth in this opinion only our reasons for disagreement with Judge Troop as to the disposition of the second assignment of error and, of course, the resulting judgment.

The second assignment of error is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. HuffmanOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Harris v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Stacy v. Van CorenOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Midling v. PerriniOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. ParkerOhio Supreme Court · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ConleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. State v. BurgunOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. State v. McNicholsOhio Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API